Recreation Disturbing ...

Congrats you just confused a drunk person

 

rofl

that's just silly.. if a friend of yours has the chance to get some if you were any friend of his you would do nothing to get in his way..

 

so thats where they went....sorry man, can u mail em to me?

ah...yeah j/k bad joke/comment of mine.. ~_~;

Well, why dont you like, tack a "Found" poster on a bulletin board for them..then maybe someone will claim them... (I bet some pervert will tho..) :sweat:

 

Yes I think mord has a good point, nobody should have to forgoe sexual interaction for some misplaced sense of loyalty that was brought about in the first place by homo erotic frustration due to lack of female companionship. This first arose in the older times, early 20th century when simple fraternisation with a girl was seen as wrong. Its as in Jail, when men are together for long periods of time without females, they release their sexual energy on each other. In conclusion, everything about the current system needs to be looked at and changed.

 

hi

hi what joke

 

Read the first post by 'Novus'.
Note to kayo: It has not been determined if Novus' story was a practical joke, what really happened is still unknown.

 

Okay, fluffyofthewind has confused us all, I think.
Lex, you are reading WAY too much into the philosophy. In spite of what you Freudians may believe, not everything is about sex. If you think the only way guys can have loyalty to each other is homoeroticism, I feel very, very, VERY sorry for all of your friends, assuming you still have any, having come on to them all because you're reading too much into your friendships.
Finally, I've come to a decision: I'm going to confront the (possible) source of the problem, but the question is how?

 

i fail to see how any of my good friends getting laid would in any way cause me offence, so much so thast I would require he not go through with it..

 

What if you live with the person, and they have a tendency not to lock the door?

 

then I'd make myself a cup of tea and hang around to teach them both a lesson, but i wouldn't under *any* circumstances go around saying 'bro's before ho's'"

 

I'm thinking we'll have to agree to disagree in order to keep this one civil. But you may be right about my ideal being nothing more. I'll have to consider that.