Fwd: Tomita copyright/

Discussion in 'Tomita' started by cloud at eircom.net, Aug 8, 2000.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. To: Isao Tomita Mailing List <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: ndkent <ndkent at optonline.net>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 20:56:39 -0400
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 01:52:58 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    References: <20000725000127.21520.qmail at hotmail.com> <397CE613.8AC0D479 at optonline.net> <+UcNGhAdDWf5Ewi9 at bertie.demon.co.uk>
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/


    > Greetings,
    > a couple of months ago, one of you good guys was in
    > conversation with Tomita and quoted him saying he was surprised that
    > anybody still listened to his 70's albums.

    This may be coupled with the impression I got that his synth music isn't
    incredibly popular in Japan.

    > Given that they're now a tad hard to get hold of, what's the copyright
    > situation with the 'deleted' albums? Is it held by the record company
    > or Tomita?

    It would be interesting to see the effect of instead of the standard
    "I'd really like it if you could reissue album X" to request it phrased
    in a question just like many of the people on this list are sending to
    this list. "I'm told this is a very good album, how can I listen to it,
    how can buy a copy on CD?"

    > My own attitude also says that if anyone wants a copy of a computer
    > program I wrote 10 years ago, that's been off-sale for 9 years and 6
    > months and will never go on sale again.... "help yourself, I'm
    > flattered. P.S. have you seen my _new_ stuff, which you can purchase
    > from....".

    I think the albums have been off sale since only last year. This might
    be because they are revamping them for cheaper re-issue. I don't know
    this for a fact, but I do know that this is a standard practice with
    other artists with back catalogs. They withdraw the full price series.
    Let the copies in shops sell out, come back with mid-line or budget
    repackagings.

    As for who owns what, we know BGM Japan just put out another best of
    last year. I think there was a UK best of in '98 or something?? By the
    way, Snowflakes came out in the U.S. this year, not 1999, so I'd think
    these works are still BMG owned all over.

    > It's an assumption that may be tempered by geography. Here in the UK
    > Tomita hasn't readily been available in any of the "mainstream" stores
    > for a few years - not in my experience, anyway.

    Ben Ward must be buying anything good up ;)

    but seriously, one problem is the section. Sometimes he is with
    Classical albums, sometimes he's wherever one would find say Tangerine
    Dream, which could be electronic, new age, I don't know. I kind of
    recall seeing some in the larger London shops in '98. Anyway, now with
    the internet the cheap U.S. versions should still be fairly easy to
    find. Its the albums that weren't part of the U.S. Surround series that
    are tough, except for those annoying "Best Of" albums, annoying because
    whenever I think I see something good, it just turns out to be yet
    another best of. Like when someone has a Tomita import... of course its
    an imported "Best of"

    > Be aware that there are at least 3 different versions of this on CD.
    > There's the original RCA, the RCA Dolby surround,

    true, there is also the several Japanese pressings called "Claire de
    Lune" which is the Japanese re-title, but for all intents and purposes
    there are only 2 you could find new (assuming you aren't in japan or
    hitting used sources). the Surround version which has a lot of silver on
    it and the newer and improved "High Performance" version which says just
    that real big. There are older CDs like Mike says but unless found used
    they wouldn't be sitting around 10+ years.

    > the HP release being the best, but none are what I
    > would call spectacular.

    I'd disagree, flawed, yes, but I was quite happy hearing "The Planets"
    from CD, I for one thought it was better than my circa 1982 U.S. vinyl pressing.

    For those who can't read between the lines. its obvious what the High
    Preformance release was about. RCA knows that some kind of better than
    16/44.1 standard CD format is around the corner. They are taking the
    time now to make sure that new classical recordings are done in 24/96 at
    least and more splashy vintage works are remastered to avoid the rush.
    It obviously doesn't hurt that until then they can sell them as standard
    CDs one more time.

    > Is this the same Prelude to Afternoon of a Faun version that was on
    Firebird?

    yes

    since its the same composer it is a good coupling. Reading between the
    lines I might also guess that the successor to CD format is exciting to
    music labels since they can sell them for about twice a regular CD
    costs. They want to add some running length because classical reviewers
    always criticize releases when the running length is skimpy (like "its a
    full price reissue and only 42 minutes long" and subtract a star and a
    half from the review)



    > I say only certain territories because this is the possibly the reason that
    > the 1991 reissues of almost his entire back catalogue happened in Japan
    > only.

    I won't disagree, but I'm not sure either. As you say, an artist signs a
    contract and that covers a region of the world. Generally Japan has
    always been a separate region for everyone.

    As for the 1991 reissues, Japan always likes to do deep back catalogs.
    look how much vintage Jazz stays in print in Japan. Numbers that need to
    be pressed and sell are quite different. Its more like BMG U.S. did half
    the catalog in surround as a test since tht format was big then then I
    guess didn't go through with the other half


    > Or it could of course have been non-Japanese record company
    > disinterest. I think unless you're Madonna or George Michael, no-one is
    > guaranteed a global release anymore (if they ever were.)

    you make odd choices. I understand there was big legal trouble with
    George Michael, which he didn't win but it made enough of a stink to get
    the action he wanted. I guess what was going on was he was with Columbia
    or something, which was bought out by Sony. He felt Sony was
    disinterested but still had his contract so he sued them for millions
    saying they were perventing him from having a hit by innaction. he
    didn't win but got out of that contract due to the stink. Anyway he did
    that image change with his new label, had a luke warm hit then
    embarrassed himself in a few ways.

    Madonna shrewdly got her own record label as part of a contract. This
    usually bombs, but since she gets Prodigy and now Orbit (tie in to this
    discussion!) on her label and avoids less talented vanity projects,
    she's probably better off (even if Prodigy seems like a vintage act now).

    > Tomita has pointed out that all the key record company relationships he had,
    > especially with the folks at RCA Victor in New York (through which he found
    > his global audience) are defunct, as these gentlemen are alas all either
    > retired or dead.

    yes, it ties in with George Michael. These companies are traded like
    goods, someone else gets the whole thing and doesn't care about 100s
    other artists, they just care about the handful that top the charts, and
    wind up getting their careers derailed without doing anything wrong
    aside from the big mistake of signing to a major when they should have
    stayed indie (not that they don't get sold or more likely drop dead)

    nick


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #1
  2. To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: "Mike B (digiboy)" <digiboy at erols.com>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 10:17:02 -0400
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:08:28 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    In-Reply-To: <c5.7add67f.26aeeb48 at aol.com>
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    >Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    > Hi Mike,
    > (so... there's more than a few of us AHr's on this list! ; ) )


    > Is this the same Prelude to Afternoon of a Faun version that was on
    >Firebird?

    Yes, I think they just figured it would be nice to add it to the Debussy
    package.


    > I hope that the HP versions are better, because that's what I'm going to
    >buy if they are. Are HP versions available for the first four albums, or just
    >Snowflakes so far?

    As far as i know, only Snowflakes is out on the HP series. I agree that
    the sound quality on the Tomita CD's has been a disappointment tho each new
    version is an improvement. I don't think the vinyl versions were very good
    either. My suspicion is that the sound quality of the original master just
    isn't very good. The other thing is, that to my ear, the mellotron often
    comes off as sounding very lo-fi. I know that's the way a mellotron
    sounds, kind of like complaining that a harpsichord sounds tinny.

    > Changing channels here... Is anyone on this list "in contact" with Tomita?
    >As I understand it, he only speaks Japanese... I just thought it would be
    >neat to send an "email from a fan" to him. Through the years, I've had the
    >pleasure of meeting or exchanging emails with a few of my all time favorite
    >musicians, not Tomita though.


    Ben? Nick?

    Mike Berman
    digiboy at erols.com


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #2
  3. To: Isao Tomita Mailing List <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: Benjamin Ward <bw at benward.net>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:16:05 +0000
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:11:37 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    In-Reply-To: <u1eZudBXMXf5EwSC at bertie.demon.co.uk>
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>
    User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    >>
    >> Most Record companies retain the Masters in order that
    >> they can exploit them on behalf of the Artist and themselves.
    >> Deleting an album doesn't mean the copyright is deleted!
    >>
    >
    > I've no problem with the "length" of copyright, but was interested to
    > know the copyright holder for Tomita's work (Tomita or the record
    > company).
    >

    Tomita (theoretically) now once more owns the copyright in all his earlier
    'Western' albums, although this applies only to certain territories. He was
    as surprised by the 1999 release of 'Snowflakes Are Dancing' as I think most
    of us were at the time.

    I say only certain territories because this is the possibly the reason that
    the 1991 reissues of almost his entire back catalogue happened in Japan
    only. Or it could of course have been non-Japanese record company
    disinterest. I think unless you're Madonna or George Michael, no-one is
    guaranteed a global release anymore (if they ever were.)

    Tomita has pointed out that all the key record company relationships he had,
    especially with the folks at RCA Victor in New York (through which he found
    his global audience) are defunct, as these gentlemen are alas all either
    retired or dead.

    > The re-
    > release of another "greatest hits" album might well sink without trace.

    Hopefully! :)

    > I agree - if he can make money from them, then he should, but that
    > doesn't seem to be happening for him. I work in the software industry
    > and exactly the same principle applies - it's heartbreaking to put in
    > massive effort, only to see it ripped off.

    Wendy Carlos has some interesting things to say about digital
    signatures/copyrighting of audio. It's somewhere on www.wendycarlos.com

    > I was interested in Tomita's attitude, given his surprise that any of us
    > still listen _and_ the fact he _isn't_ making money from it AFAIK.

    He of course makes his money from new projects, and the royalties from the
    70's and 80's will have been substantial. I think he himself felt that he
    had moved on from analogue synthesis technology and the early stuff, until
    the advent of the Bach Fantasy album. He'll still be getting royalties from
    places where his CDs are still on sale (one presumes!)

    I'd agree that the best thing that can be done in terms of getting the older
    albums re-released is to petition your local BMG office, although you'll
    have to battle through the hoards of indifferent twenty-something record
    execs first (apologies to all twenty-something record execs of course! ;-)

    Benjamin

    > <Ducks behind sofa, knowing that most of the people on the list are
    > professional musicians!>

    Hey Ian! I've got ducks behind my sofa too! ;-)


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #3
  4. To: tomita at listbot.com
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: IXQY at aol.com
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 09:08:24 EDT
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:08:35 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    Hi Mike,
    (so... there's more than a few of us AHr's on this list! ; ) )

    In a message dated 7/25/00 7:32:20 AM Central Daylight Time,
    digiboy at erols.com writes:

    > FWIW:
    > You might well be tempted to pick up Snowflakes the first place you find
    > it since it will probably be cheap.
    > Be aware that there are at least 3 different versions of this on CD.
    > There's the original RCA, the RCA Dolby surround, and most recently, the
    > RCA High Performance version. I think the first 2 are OOP but I still see
    > them around, usually under $10. The third one just came out a few months
    > ago but it's a mid-line usually going for $10-$13. They are progressively
    > better in sound quality, the HP release being the best, but none are what I
    > would call spectacular. The HP release also includes 1 extra 10 minute
    > track; Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun. I guess that and the sound
    > would make it the best choice.

    Is this the same Prelude to Afternoon of a Faun version that was on
    Firebird?

    Speaking of Tomita's CD releases.. When I bought the Pictures at an
    Exhibition (a surround sound version) CD, I couldn't wait to hear it when I
    got home. I have to say that I am a bit disappointed. I seem to recall the
    album sounding MUCH better than this CD does. There's just no life in the
    sound. Not like I remember anyway. I noticed that there are some parts that
    actually disappear in the mix as they pan around, presumably due to the
    surround sound encoding process. Is it just me and my aging ears?

    I hope that the HP versions are better, because that's what I'm going to
    buy if they are. Are HP versions available for the first four albums, or just
    Snowflakes so far?

    Changing channels here... Is anyone on this list "in contact" with Tomita?
    As I understand it, he only speaks Japanese... I just thought it would be
    neat to send an "email from a fan" to him. Through the years, I've had the
    pleasure of meeting or exchanging emails with a few of my all time favorite
    musicians, not Tomita though.

    Thanks for the info,
    Andrew Sanchez


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #4
  5. To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: "Mike B (digiboy)" <digiboy at erols.com>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 08:40:24 -0400
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:28:42 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    In-Reply-To: <f6.12ee8ee.26aed45d at aol.com>
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    My next
    >purchase willl be Snowflakes are Dancing and may buy that online if I don't
    >find it here in town.

    > Good luck in your search,
    > Andrew Sanchez



    FWIW:
    You might well be tempted to pick up Snowflakes the first place you find
    it since it will probably be cheap.
    Be aware that there are at least 3 different versions of this on CD.
    There's the original RCA, the RCA Dolby surround, and most recently, the
    RCA High Performance version. I think the first 2 are OOP but I still see
    them around, usually under $10. The third one just came out a few months
    ago but it's a mid-line usually going for $10-$13. They are progressively
    better in sound quality, the HP release being the best, but none are what I
    would call spectacular. The HP release also includes 1 extra 10 minute
    track; Prelude to the Afternoon of a Faun. I guess that and the sound
    would make it the best choice.

    Mike Berman
    digiboy at erols.com


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #5
  6. To: Isao Tomita Mailing List <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: Ian Sharrock <ian at sharrock.org>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:10:22 +0100
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:11:42 +0100
    Disposition-Notification-To: Ian Sharrock <ids at sharrock.org>
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    In-Reply-To: <f6.12ee8ee.26aed45d at aol.com>
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    References: <f6.12ee8ee.26aed45d at aol.com>
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    In message <f6.12ee8ee.26aed45d at aol.com>, IXQY at aol.com writes
    > Hello Ian,
    > I'm curious about your comment that Tomita isn't receiving royalties from
    >his early albums anymore... Did you read this somewhere, or was that just an
    >assumption?

    It's an assumption that may be tempered by geography. Here in the UK
    Tomita hasn't readily been available in any of the "mainstream" stores
    for a few years - not in my experience, anyway. I've tried asking, but
    the answer generally comes back "who?", that the works are deleted,
    unavailable, "we might be able to find an import at only X,000% mark-up"
    or "we have this specialist music search that might find it if you pay
    us £50 to look".

    I may just be unlucky. You can certainly get the "more recent" (mainly
    soundtrack) work imported, but I've had no joy getting (say) "Planets".

    May assumption about royalties was along the lines of "If you don't sell
    albums, you don't get royalties on sales you haven't made". I'm sure
    that lots of sales would mean lots of royalties, but Mr. Tomita doesn't
    seem to be selling that well here :) I must admit to assuming that
    carried elsewhere.

    > If it's the first few "well known" Tomita releases that you are interested
    >in, they are available. In the last couple of weeks I've found most if not
    >all of the early albums on CD at various online vendor sites. I was looking
    >to buy Pictures at an Exhibition, but wound up finding it at a local Borders
    >Books. I also found Kosmos there and bought it as well ($11.50 each). My next
    >purchase willl be Snowflakes are Dancing and may buy that online if I don't
    >find it here in town.

    Interesting. I'll have a gander - any suggestions for vendor sites?
    I'm not actually missing much myself, but as I've said, I now have
    friends who are catching on by 'word of mouth' who can't buy the works
    'locally'. I dislike copying CDs - it tends to impoverish the artist
    and discourage new works.

    Thinking about the last sentence.... maybe I should just run off a few
    million Eminem CDs and hope :)
    --
    Ian Sharrock. Permission to send unsolicited commercial e-mail to this
    host is explicitly *withdrawn*


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #6
  7. To: tomita at listbot.com
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: IXQY at aol.com
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 07:30:37 EDT
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:30:50 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    In a message dated 7/25/00 6:01:04 AM Central Daylight Time, ian at sharrock.org
    writes:

    > > It's the age old question of commerciality. If the Public
    > > wants it the music will be re-released. If they don't, well..
    >
    > It's a matter of scale I suppose - he's not exactly in the public eye
    > these days (was he ever "big" - I'm a bit too young to know!). The re-
    > release of another "greatest hits" album might well sink without trace.
    >
    > I'm a terrible cynic I know, but I have doubts that he's be given a
    > seriously large amount of promotion if the albums were re-released.
    > Pity, because as I originally said, I've a number of friends who've been
    > "turned" by the likes of William Orbit and have subsequently enjoyed the
    > Tomita I've played to them - but then find they can't buy it :-(
    >
    > > In any event the Man sweated over these works and should
    > > always be paid for that effort, and for what he's given to
    > > each of us.
    >
    > I agree - if he can make money from them, then he should, but that
    > doesn't seem to be happening for him. I work in the software industry
    > and exactly the same principle applies - it's heartbreaking to put in
    > massive effort, only to see it ripped off.
    >
    > My own attitude also says that if anyone wants a copy of a computer
    > program I wrote 10 years ago, that's been off-sale for 9 years and 6
    > months and will never go on sale again.... "help yourself, I'm
    > flattered. P.S. have you seen my _new_ stuff, which you can purchase
    > from....".
    >
    > I was interested in Tomita's attitude, given his surprise that any of us
    > still listen _and_ the fact he _isn't_ making money from it AFAIK.
    >
    > If there was a mechanism where I could download "Planets" and he got the
    > royalties, I'd be at the front of the queue :)
    >
    > My post was all about permission - would Tomita permit this, given he's
    > not making any personal gain anyway. You'll notice that I didn't even
    > _think_ about asking the record company ;-)
    >
    > It would be all too easy to just suggest that everyone MP3s whatever
    > they own and heads for Napster - it's not stunningly likely that the
    > record company is going to come out all guns blazing. Not when there
    > are bigger fish to fry, anyway :-(
    >
    > <Ducks behind sofa, knowing that most of the people on the list are
    > professional musicians!>

    Hello Ian,
    I'm curious about your comment that Tomita isn't receiving royalties from
    his early albums anymore... Did you read this somewhere, or was that just an
    assumption?

    If it's the first few "well known" Tomita releases that you are interested
    in, they are available. In the last couple of weeks I've found most if not
    all of the early albums on CD at various online vendor sites. I was looking
    to buy Pictures at an Exhibition, but wound up finding it at a local Borders
    Books. I also found Kosmos there and bought it as well ($11.50 each). My next
    purchase willl be Snowflakes are Dancing and may buy that online if I don't
    find it here in town.

    Good luck in your search,
    Andrew Sanchez


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #7
  8. To: Isao Tomita Mailing List <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: Re: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: Ian Sharrock <ian at sharrock.org>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:59:35 +0100
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:00:39 +0100
    Disposition-Notification-To: Ian Sharrock <ids at sharrock.org>
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    In-Reply-To: <CB9B80314082D31182BC00508B5E1A4E041F2D at shaya11e.haya.gb.eur.emigrp.com>
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    References: <CB9B80314082D31182BC00508B5E1A4E041F2D at shaya11e.haya.gb.eur.emigrp.com>
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    In message <CB9B80314082D31182BC00508B5E1A4E041F2D at shaya11e.haya.gb.eur.
    emigrp.com>, Bassett, David <BassettD at emigroup.com> writes
    >Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    > In the UK Copyright lasts:-

    > literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works
    > the life of the author + 70 years

    > for Performers, record and film producers 50 years after the
    > work is lawfully made or if the work is published during that
    > 50 year period, 50 years after publication.

    > Most Record companies retain the Masters in order that
    > they can exploit them on behalf of the Artist and themselves.
    > Deleting an album doesn't mean the copyright is deleted!


    I've no problem with the "length" of copyright, but was interested to
    know the copyright holder for Tomita's work (Tomita or the record
    company).

    > It's the age old question of commerciality. If the Public
    > wants it the music will be re-released. If they don't, well..

    It's a matter of scale I suppose - he's not exactly in the public eye
    these days (was he ever "big" - I'm a bit too young to know!). The re-
    release of another "greatest hits" album might well sink without trace.

    I'm a terrible cynic I know, but I have doubts that he's be given a
    seriously large amount of promotion if the albums were re-released.
    Pity, because as I originally said, I've a number of friends who've been
    "turned" by the likes of William Orbit and have subsequently enjoyed the
    Tomita I've played to them - but then find they can't buy it :-(

    > In any event the Man sweated over these works and should
    > always be paid for that effort, and for what he's given to
    > each of us.

    I agree - if he can make money from them, then he should, but that
    doesn't seem to be happening for him. I work in the software industry
    and exactly the same principle applies - it's heartbreaking to put in
    massive effort, only to see it ripped off.

    My own attitude also says that if anyone wants a copy of a computer
    program I wrote 10 years ago, that's been off-sale for 9 years and 6
    months and will never go on sale again.... "help yourself, I'm
    flattered. P.S. have you seen my _new_ stuff, which you can purchase
    from....".

    I was interested in Tomita's attitude, given his surprise that any of us
    still listen _and_ the fact he _isn't_ making money from it AFAIK.

    If there was a mechanism where I could download "Planets" and he got the
    royalties, I'd be at the front of the queue :)

    My post was all about permission - would Tomita permit this, given he's
    not making any personal gain anyway. You'll notice that I didn't even
    _think_ about asking the record company ;-)

    It would be all too easy to just suggest that everyone MP3s whatever
    they own and heads for Napster - it's not stunningly likely that the
    record company is going to come out all guns blazing. Not when there
    are bigger fish to fry, anyway :-(

    <Ducks behind sofa, knowing that most of the people on the list are
    professional musicians!>

    Cheers,
    Ian


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #8
  9. To: "'Isao Tomita Mailing List'" <tomita at listbot.com>
    Subject: RE: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?
    From: "Bassett, David" <BassettD at emigroup.com>
    Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:06:28 +0100
    Delivered-To: mailing list tomita at listbot.com
    Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 11:03:41 +0100
    Envelope-to: cloud at eircom.net
    Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact tomita-help at listbot.com
    Reply-To: "Isao Tomita Mailing List" <tomita at listbot.com>


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/

    In the UK Copyright lasts:-

    literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works
    the life of the author + 70 years

    for Performers, record and film producers 50 years after the
    work is lawfully made or if the work is published during that
    50 year period, 50 years after publication.

    Most Record companies retain the Masters in order that
    they can exploit them on behalf of the Artist and themselves.
    Deleting an album doesn't mean the copyright is deleted!
    It's the age old question of commerciality. If the Public
    wants it the music will be re-released. If they don't, well..
    In any event the Man sweated over these works and should
    always be paid for that effort, and for what he's given to
    each of us.

    Dave Bassett


    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ian Sharrock [mailto:ian at sharrock.org]
    Sent: 25 July 2000 10:42
    To: Isao Tomita Mailing List
    Subject: Tomita copyright/"sharing" unavailable material?


    Isao Tomita Mailing List - http://listen.to/tomita/


    Greetings,
    a couple of months ago, one of you good guys was in
    conversation with Tomita and quoted him saying he was surprised that
    anybody still listened to his 70's albums.

    Given that they're now a tad hard to get hold of, what's the copyright
    situation with the 'deleted' albums? Is it held by the record company
    or Tomita?

    If it's Tomita, then a question springs to mind: would he grant
    permission to MP3 and share his (early) music, given that you can't buy
    it and he's obviously receiving no financial reward from it?

    A lot of my pleasure comes from physically owning a given album/cd but
    it's frustrating to see other works that I can't find (or afford), or
    seeing "where can I find..." requests here on the list. I'm also
    finding that since William Orbit appeared in the UK, quite a few of my
    friends have become interested in Tomita's work, but can't buy it
    anywhere!

    I'm _NOT_ suggesting that anything which is (or could become)
    commercially available should "do a Napster", but obviously it would be
    nice just to hear the music that (to date) I've been unable to (as long
    as the man himself agrees and isn't missing out).

    Thoughts, anyone?

    Ian
    --
    Ian Sharrock. Permission to send unsolicited commercial e-mail to this
    host is explicitly *withdrawn*


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
    .
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This e-mail including any attachments is confidential and may be legally
    privileged. If you have received it in error please advise the sender
    immediately by return email and then delete it from your system. The
    unauthorised use, distribution, copying or alteration of this email is
    strictly forbidden. If you need assistance please contact the IT help desk
    on +44 207 467 2154.

    This email is from a unit or subsidiary of EMI Group plc, registered in
    England No 229231 Registered Office: 4 Tenterden Street, London W1A 2AY..

    .


    ______________________________________________________________________
    To unsubscribe, write to tomita-unsubscribe at listbot.com

    Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb
     
    #9
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page