Debate That the punishment should fit the criminal.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by KaMeKaZi, Feb 25, 2006.

  1. KaMeKaZi

    KaMeKaZi Insanity$%#

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    That the punishment should fit the criminal.

    Debate
     
    #1
  2. Ciel

    Ciel Unoa Freak
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2001
    Messages:
    4,718
    Likes Received:
    152
    You should elaborate more in your thread starters and give an opinion too, I think it would help us all out.


    Do you mean, let's say a woman rigged her own attempted murder, just to claim insurance money, so she could apply to get a whole ton of cash since it turned out she was desperate for money to save her baby who was dying unless she got a 30,000 dollar surgery?

    So she should be tried more leniently when it came to insurance fraud and such due to her circumstances?

    Or someone who get's arrested for stealing a loaf of bread because his children were starving? Instead of being put in jail, he should do community service?

    It really depends on the crime there KaMe! Murder is Murder, yet stealing could be another issue, since, I'm not quite sure but the victim/owner etc. could drop the charges if they found out the circumstances.

    Some people get off a harsh sentence for murder due to some circumstancial stuff anyways, the issue is really difficult.
     
    #2
  3. KaMeKaZi

    KaMeKaZi Insanity$%#

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2001
    Messages:
    1,816
    Likes Received:
    28
    Pretty much yes it would be the EYE for and EYE type punishment..


    And yes a lot of case's people steal to survive.. BUT in the western society most people steal to make a profit.. So if your stealing to make a profit should your hands be cut off??
     
    #3
  4. Samurai Me

    Samurai Me New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2006
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    7
    I beileve that they should punish them for what they did if they are not strugling(I think I spelt it wrong) to survive. For example,lets say there is a man who is poaching,and he is doing it because he is trying to provide for his family,and he gets caught,he should not be punished,because he is trying to provide for his family. Know,if he did it and he had all the money in the world,he should have a very harsh punishment!

    I apologize if I am coming across unclear. I am having trouble putting what im trying to say into words.
     
    #4
  5. Eternal-Blaze

    Eternal-Blaze New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    397
    Likes Received:
    25
    I'm one that believes people should be punished the same regardless of their reasons for committing the crime. They still broke the law, so they should still get the punishment or other people will lie about their situation to take advantage of the fact that you let people off or with less of a punishment if they're struggling. Just because you're struggling in life doesn't mean you HAVE to do something illegal to get by.

    And while we're on the topic of criminals and punishments, I'm also one who believes that should who does something to someone or something else should be punished in the same way they harmed that person or thing if it's practical. For example, if a person killed 208 people by stabbing them in the stomach with a knife, he would be punished by being stabbed in the stomach recreating the location of the stab wounds and the knife used to stab the people. If he lived, he would heal in a hospital. When he's completely healed, he would be stabbed in the stomach again for person #2. This would continue until he either dies or he was stabbed for all 208 people. But, since he killed those 208 people, he would then be killed. Cruel you say? So is what he did to those people. If you punish people with the same thing they did to other people, they'll be a bit more hesitant to do stuff to other people.
     
    #5
  6. Hitohiro

    Hitohiro Angel of Wind

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2004
    Messages:
    892
    Likes Received:
    59
    What you're looking at is Hamurabis Code "Eye for an eye" like mentioned before. Should the crime fit the punishment, yes and no. If it's murder, the person should be murdered, no matter the reason. Robbery, poaching, fraud, enh, I have mixed fealings for these. It depends on why these crimes were commited whether or not I would say an "eye for an eye".
     
    #6

Share This Page